Your problems solved
As quite a few American & foreign pundits have begun to grasp, the U.S. electorate has been voting consistently for two things, through many election cycles. First, they want a very large, comprehensive, & intrusive Nanny State. And second, they don’t want to pay for it. From the polls, which show strong opposition to raising the debt ceiling, we further learn that they don’t want their guvmint to borrow the money, either.
Readers of this website will appreciate that these are normal positions in any large, centrally bureaucratized, democratic polity, & the USA is hardly the only country poised atop some “fiscal cliff.” And let me add that the average U.S. citizen is no more stupid than the average Canadian citizen. Indeed, from what I can see up here, that would be impossible.
Northern Europeans pay much higher taxes; Swedes for instance about double what Americans pay, the French & Germans not much less than the Swedes. The British, who have by northern European standards a low tax regime, pay something like half again more than United Statists, & Canadians also pay more, by maybe a third. And we are all closer to balancing our budgets.
From this point of view, Obama & the Democrats are wimps. They say they want to balance the federal budget, fair enough. We know they oppose any significant cuts in spending, so we can forget about that. They are raising taxes, but not by nearly enough. If they were serious, however, they could balance that budget by higher taxes alone.
Start by simply doubling the latest tax rate on “the rich,” to around 100 percent. That won’t make much difference to the deficit, so double it, too, on all the other income brackets. Now, we are getting somewhere. Keep doubling across the board until revenues & expenditures level out. It’s that easy. Soon, everyone can be paying 100 percent, & by the principle of graduated income tax, the rich paying, say, 10 or 20 or 50 times what they earn. Given demographic trends, the rates would have to keep rising at an accelerating pace towards infinity, but hey, it’s just numbers.
The alternative, we now learn, is to mint trillion-dollar coins. This has been proposed with mock seriousness (but now increasing gravity) by several economic sages of what we might call the neo-Weimar school. There is a loophole in the coining regulations that will allow the U.S. Treasury to do this. Simply mint another one each time the debt ceiling approaches, & there will be no need to ask Congress to raise that ceiling again.
What puzzles me is the Republican response from Congress. They may have retained control in the House of Representatives, thanks to careful gerrymandering of districts, but really, everyone knows they lost the election, & that a solid majority of Americans (increased since November according to polls) believe Obama “understands” them, & is looking out for their best interests. For comparison, well over three-quarters of Americans abominate the Congress, & condemn it for being insufficiently cooperative with the Obama administration.
So why not give Obama & company whatever they want?
The Republicans hesitate in view of the likely destruction of the United States of America, to which they continue to cling, as to their guns & their Bibles, with an understandable sentimental attachment. And perhaps they feel the injustice, that many tens of millions who do not like the guvmint & are opposed to 9 dollars in 10 of its spending, if not more, should be compelled to pay for what they think is evil. But again, hey: they lost the election, & the majority in a democracy have always carried rape rights on the minority.
Why are the Republicans dithering, when there is work to be done? Why don’t Boehner & McConnell lead a little delegation over to the White House to offer a surrender? “You tell us how you propose to fix the problems, & we, by abstaining on every Congressional vote, will let it all pass through.”
Of course, poor President Obama would then have to fight with the Congressional Democrats who, when push comes to shove, actually agree with their Republican colleagues on most substantive issues. But a civil war between the White House & the rest of the Democratic Party would be, from a Republican standpoint, so much more fun than one in which the Republicans themselves step up to take the beating. It might even expose some part of the great American Obamanoid majority to aspects of the fiscal problem they had previously overlooked.
Meanwhile, let me propose that all you Yankee Rednecks move up here to Canada. You know, we could take over this place.
We “Yankee Rednecks” could take over Canada, but only if we deported the liberal boneheads (roughly ninety per cent of the country) to the United States. That would be almost impossible to achieve, unfortunately.
Why don’t we start small, with David’s neighborhood.
There are two things that are almost certain in life. 1) Politicians will make promises and 2) Politicians will break their promises. The last politician who actually did what he said he would do was Mike Harris, and look where that got him.
This has been going on for so long that voters have stopped expecting politicians to honour their promises. McGuinty promised not to raise taxes and then promptly increased them. He then got re-elected.
But the minting of a trillion dollar coin and the fiscal cliff do have something in common. They are both smoke and mirrors with no basis in reality.
“Thanks to a Republican governor committed to developing its natural resources, not punishing entrepreneurs who do, Texas legislators are facing an $8.8 billion surplus over the next two years.”
(Source: Washington Examiner. January 9, 2013)
__________________
Secession won’t work. Rednecks moving to Canada would no longer have red necks. Looks like the only alternative is to expand Texas.
Alternatively you could all come down under to Australia where the weather is better and an influx in the right places could make all the difference.
My children keep talking about moving to Canada, so as a permissive parent I might just accede. With regard to a Republican surrender to the White House, a “serious” (recalling the discussion of inverted commas in recent days) political commentator here, Pete Wehner, who worked for Karl Rove in the Bush 43 years, has proposed exactly that, on the grounds that maybe the voting public will get tired of Obamaworld and put him (Wehner) back in the West Wing before he enters hospice care. How House Republicans would explain this to their constituents I do not know, never mind quasi-philosophical objections over the role of an opposition in a representative republic, especially when opposition is most needed as the fall-back ahead of another round of secession (though I increasingly see such as the preferred option).
The prospect of vicious internecine warfare on the left, as Otio raises, is real and probably inevitable. Perhaps the resulting paralysis will allow some measure of recovery, moral and fiscal, at least in the red states, if the Republican establishment can be confined to its natural habitat near large urban spaces and the coasts. But I expect it will look more like the French terror, enhanced by the Internet, Facebook, Google search histories, etc. Not friendly to frequenters of the Mass, Tridentine or Novus Ordo. Can we hope that Canada might resist, or that its geography will more likely permit a few communities to survive that next stage of the current dark age?
Perhaps I should change my nom d’ecran to “Run-On Sentence.”
Texas, sure, but ya’ll need to secede first, & of course, accept the Queen. (We’ll call it the Lone Crown State.)
Alternatively, Australia looks good. Perhaps Ann H. could give us further influxive directions. Rather partial to Tasmania because it has some ocean around it. Too, there are only a half million Taswegians, so we could have them outnumbered fairly quickly.
Aside to Beast: In future our house style will be “Bush XLIII,” & not “Bush 43.”
No need to secede. We only need to build up our cash reserves and then take the Midwest through eminent domain. Then, we move across the border and grab Alberta. Once we have the latter, we will, of course, change the name, so as to rid ourselves of all royal appendices. We will call this an “albertdectomy.”
For the record, the proper spelling for the contraction of “you” and “all” is y’all.
With regard to Australia, there are many marginal seats in the outer suburbs of the major cities and regional areas. Seats in New South Wales and Queensland will count the most though good numbers in any Labor (think Democrat) seat would do the trick. The polls say that the Labor government is heading for a bad loss in this year’s election without any help from our Yankie friends. This government has been quite inept but that doesn’t always get you voted out. Our Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, currently has John McTernan (of Blair Government fame) on her staff so we don’t rule out any tricks. She has already accused the conservative leader of being a misogynist.
Tasmania is a lovely state, sparsely populated as noted, full of beautiful old buildings from its colonial heyday. It is currently overrun with Greens. Its State Government is a Labor/Green alliance. The State has been unable to support itself for a long time now and is subsidized by the other States. The members of the State Parliament are voted in on a proportional voting system (Hare-Clark) so while the Greens have any significant following they will have members in the Parliament. People are moving out of Tasmania as there are few prospects there. People moving in will want to bring their own business and be prepared to fight Green-tape until the overthrow has been accomplished.
A shocking lapse on “y’all.” My most mortified apology.
Not shocking, just foolish. One who courts rednecks to move to Canada should begin by learning their argot.
Point taken, CTC. We have ordered an immediate gullywash of our Argot Department, up here in the High Doganate. Heads will roll. Toads will float.
Our gun laws here in Canada are too strict to attract any true rednecks to want to acquire Canadian citizenship in the normal fashion. What would be required would be an invasion of Canada by U.S. rednecks and an overthrowing of the governments (both federal and provincial.) Then, however, as I noted above, is the problem of having to deal with the existing resident Canadians who are about ninety per cent “progressive” liberals of the most odious, cloying, ignorant, sheep-like variety imaginable. (A great many Canadians think that pinko Pierre Trudeau was our finest Prime Minister and Norman Bethune, medical assistant to mass murderer Chairman Mao, was a great Canadian worthy of public monuments being built at government expense.)
Perhaps the U.S redneck invaders of Canada could set up reeducation camps like the commies do to transition the Canadians into becoming responsible machine gun owners and large half ton truck aficionados? It would take many years, however, to get the Canadian city dwellers to think like real flesh and blood men and women, instead of the fictional characters portrayed in imported liberal/left movies and bad novels written by government-subsidized socialists.
Ain’t nuthin but a thang.
I have to admit I like these straightforward, secular posts. Yes, things are currently [not a quote] bad [end quote] for those who think like we do. Often I turn to the Desiderata and other meaningful leaning posts to maintain some sense of balance through it all — if I was Catholic that might be enough too.
While I am of the Beverly Hillbilly, Yankee Redneck frame of mind, the current times are not that bothersome to me — in fact I find them exhilarating. What we witness now seems to me a brief phase, though we may all expire before we see the improvements you’ve so eloquently described looking rearward.
I tend toward cynicism, but as has been said, we cynics are often right and happy to be wrong. I’ve learned much through sailing small boats through stormy seas. If you keep your boat 50 degrees off the wind and drift slowly downwind you will likely be fine no matter how long the storm. So that is what I strive to do while off the sea and it seems to be working.
As for well written words sizing up the situation — words that are true and therapeutic and perhaps necessary — such words may, but generally do not, cause the storm to end sooner.
You’ve expressed observation of happiness, or at least acceptance, Indians express in being alive as things are, regardless of their stations in life. Should we strive to be any different given the situation? MKD did point out, without endorsement; such ease may be as a result of the belief in reincarnation. However, I think such organic integration and acceptance to one’s lot in life can be found outside of that idea. A nice warm day seems to do it for me.
What an astute crowd! With all DW’s world economic problem-solving suggestions, you immediately honed in on the one most likely to succeed and started helping him flesh it out. DW for benevolent dictator! The commentariat for his court! Gullywashing forever!
Wait just a sec, Estey. The only ground DW controls is the High Doghouse and I’ve observed no armaments there (other than a cricket bat), so it’s way too early to be thinking of him as a viable dictator. If he, via a beer hall putsch or some other militant action, can take and hold Parkdale and then Toronto, I’ll consider the notion more than fantasy (and begin to plan an anti-royalist movement).
Canada isn’t “royalist” in any sense recogizable. Will and Kate can offload and the crowds will twitter and glitter, but there is no mass sentiment directed toward establishing a proper royalist dictatorship. (If only there was, sigh.)
All the Yankees have to worship is old freemason squires like Washington, Franklin, Jefferson etc. (You know, the fellows who kick-started the catastrophic French Revolution that has got the world into a fine mess indeed!)
In the contemporary era, we have Sen. Ted Cruz. (Born in Calgary.) And, then there’s Gov. Piyush “Bobby” Jindal. (Degree from Oxford; conceived in India, born in Louisiana.) We like these immigrants from the Commonwealth of Nations.
Potential motto: To make the world safe for feudalism.
ff